Extreme Political Correctness Is Lethal
By Assemblyman Dov Hikind
Despite the obvious nature of last week’s terror attacks in Paris, it took quite some time before the media even felt comfortable calling the attackers terrorists. And if things keep going in the direction they’ve been heading, the term will likely disappear from U.S. reporting as well. The word terrorist will be politically incorrect. To the extreme. We’ll call domestic attackers “disgruntled Americans.” Or perhaps just “vexed.”
Can extreme political correctness reach that level of absurdity? A better question might be, hasn’t that happened already?
People are frightened now. That’s a healthy reaction to violence, malevolence, and murder. People want to know that we are doing everything we can to stem the tide of global terrorism, which is not only a problem in the Middle East and in Europe, but has already been brought to our shores in incidents that were isolated but equally deadly. While September 11 may seem like ancient history to some, the specter of the catastrophic bombing of the Boston Marathon is still recent enough to remind us that those who would kill us are more than prepared to do so. We need not look to recent events in Paris to understand that this threat is an epidemic of national and global consequence.
Unfortunately, it will eventually reach a point where law-abiding citizens—in Europe and in America—will be forced to understand that being politically correct endangers people’s lives.
Sadder still is that the people who employ terror already know this.
It’s not as if we don’t know who the terrorists are, what they want to do, or how they plan to do it. They tell us every day. They use every available stage to boast of their macro plan in public messages that they want us to see and hear, going so far as to share images of beheadings on social media. Political correctness is not a malady they share with us.
The “extremists” who attacked and murdered innocent people last week in France were known to the intelligence agencies. The problem is not our intelligence, but our unintelligence in employing our intelligence.
Members of terrorist cells are well aware that they can use their smartphones to stay in touch with each other without fear of their phones falling into the hands of agencies like the NSA—because their phones are apparently smarter than we are. In the name of political correctness, phone encryption from companies like Apple and Google now makes it next to impossible to use a captured device to gather information that could save countless lives.
This is what happens when extreme political correctness becomes more important than people.
I say it’s time to reevaluate our priorities before the next tragedy—or series of tragedies—unfolds. I believe it’s important to give law enforcement every possible power to protect our lives. I, for one, am more than willing to sacrifice a measure of my privacy for a greater measure of safety. No one is suggesting that a police state is necessary to change the balance of intelligence—both true and technological—in the interest of protecting our communities and our families from a relentless enemy that has made its intentions all too clear. Civil liberties are important. But empowering our authorities, our intelligence agencies, and law enforcement to do their jobs in the interest of the greater good is at least a modicum more civil than an extreme political correctness that continues to fuel a growing death toll. Perhaps terrorist profiling isn’t such a bad idea after all.
Will it take another extraordinary diabolical catastrophe like September 11—or even a series of such events like we’re now witnessing in France—before Americans cry “Enough!” and begin to demand the inevitable strengthening of law-enforcement rights? I hope not.
In the meantime, we’ll always have Paris.